Taylor Swift Entangled in Legal Dispute

Taylor Swift, the renowned singer, has been drawn into a legal controversy between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively, concerning the film "It Ends with Us." According to Swift’s representatives, she has been implicated in a lawsuit to create "Boulevard-clickbait," a claim they vehemently deny.

Background of the Dispute

The conflict began when Baldoni alleged that Swift had encouraged him to accept screenplay changes for the film, in which both he and Lively starred. The changes were purportedly discussed at Lively’s New York home, where Ryan Reynolds and Swift were present. However, Swift’s representatives maintain that she was not involved in casting or creative decisions and never saw the script or made notes about the film.

The Lawsuit

Lively, 37, sued Baldoni, 41, in December 2024, accusing him of sexual harassment and a smear campaign. Baldoni has countered with claims of civil blackmail, defamation, and invasion of privacy. The dispute between Lively and Baldoni has been ongoing since the film’s release last summer.

Text Message Evidence

Baldoni claims that Lively sent him a text message stating, "If you ever look, you will appreciate that I am Khaleesi, and how I happened to have a few dragons. For good or bad, but usually better. Because my dragons also protect those for which I fight." He responded supportively, expressing his enthusiasm for working with her.

Taylor Swift’s Involvement

Swift’s representatives assert that her only involvement in the film was the use of her song "My Tears Ricochet," which was one of 20 artists featured in the film. However, Isabela Ferrer, who played a younger version of Lively’s character, claimed that Swift was involved in her audition process. Swift’s representatives deny this, stating that she never visited the set, was not involved in casting or creative decisions, and only saw the film weeks after its release.

Response to the Lawsuit

Swift’s representatives argue that the lawsuit is an attempt to "use the name of Taylor Swift to arouse public interest by creating boulevard-clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case." They maintain that Swift’s involvement in the film was limited and that she should not be implicated in the dispute between Lively and Baldoni. The case is ongoing, with both parties presenting their claims and counterclaims in court.